推廣社區精神健康——議題、成就及未來展望 主辦機構——香港明愛
會議資料
會議主題及副題
會議程序表
主題演講及公開論壇講者
論文撮要
參加者天地
住宿資料
簡体中文 English 返回主頁
   
進入
聯絡我們
 
參加者天地

檢討表數據分析 (121人填寫問卷)

1. 您如何評價會議各項程序的內容／安排？

(甲) 包括答案選取不適用者的分析

  非常不滿意    非常滿意 不適用
1 2 3 4 5
a. 大會主題 I 2% 2% 5% 48% 14% 29%
b. 大會主題 II 2% 2% 8% 47% 14% 27%
c. 公開論壇 1 2% 3% 6% 44% 8% 37%
d. 公開論壇 2 2% 3% 6% 44% 8% 37%
e. 公開論壇 3 2% 3% 6% 36% 11% 42%
f. 工作坊 3% 3% 11% 29% 15% 39%
g. 分組研討會 2% 6% 15% 49% 13% 15%
h. 參觀精神健康服務單位 1% 1% 2% 16% 7% 73%
i. 圓桌會議 2% 4% 3% 26% 12% 53%
j. 會議場刊 2% 3% 10% 48% 24% 13%
k. 整體安排 2% 6% 11% 59% 19% 3%

(乙) 不包括答案選取不適用者的分析

  扣除選取不適用者的
填問卷人數
(全部填問卷人數:121)		 非常不滿意   非常滿意
1 2 3 4 5
a. 大會主題 I 86 2% 2% 8% 68% 20%
b. 大會主題 II 88 2% 3% 11% 64% 20%
c. 公開論壇 1 76 3% 5% 9% 70% 13%
d. 公開論壇 2 81 2% 5% 19% 58% 16%
e. 公開論壇 3 70 3% 4% 10% 63% 20%
f. 工作坊 73 4% 4% 19% 48% 25%
g. 分組研討會 103 2% 8% 17% 57% 16%
h. 參觀精神健康服務單位 32 3% 3% 6% 63% 25%
i. 圓桌會議 57 4% 9% 7% 54% 26%
j. 會議場刊 105 2% 4% 11% 55% 28%
k. 整體安排 117 2% 6% 12% 61% 19%

2. 您如何評價會議主題及內容的益處？

  非常不滿意   非常滿意
1 2 3 4 5
a. 對您現在及未來工作的益處
1% 7% 21% 62% 9%
b. 內容與您從事臨床實務工作的相關性
1% 5% 30% 52% 12%
c. 內容範圍的涵蓋性
1% 7% 25% 57% 10%
d. 內容的深度與廣度
2% 12% 46% 35% 5%
e. 提供最新的知識
1% 2% 32% 54% 11%
f. 增強您的承擔
1% 3% 38% 50% 8%
g. 達到您的期望
1% 8% 34% 49% 8%

3. 若以下所列各項為您的目的，您如何評價這些目的在會議中的達致程度？

  非常不滿意   非常滿意
1 2 3 4 5
a. 獲得新知識及概念以提升個人 / 專業發展
2% 6% 28% 55% 9%
b. 獲得新知識及技巧以改善服務
2% 4% 33% 54% 7%
c. 透過與本地 / 海外同業交流經驗，擴濶個人視野
2% 5% 25% 56% 12%
d. 為未來的資訊交流，與參加者 / 機構建立聯繫
2% 17% 39% 34% 8%
e. 其他（請列明及表示達致程度）：
- 給講者的發言時間
- 擴闊社會工作及臨床研究的知識
1% 6% 6% 6% 12%

4. 其他

(甲) 包括答案選取不適用者的分析

  非常不滿意   非常滿意 不適用
1 2 3 4 5
a. 報名程序
2% 5% 25% 46% 20% 2%
b. 場地、設施、器材及其他流桯安排
2% 3% 15% 52% 28% 0
c. 會議三天的會期適當否？
2% 3% 17% 52% 21% 5%
d. 活動程序的日程表
2% 6% 30% 47% 13% 2%
e. 網頁
2% 4% 24% 41% 20% 9%
f. 其他（請列明及表示滿意程度）：
- 耳筒機的使用者
3% 1% 5% 5% 2% 19%

(乙) 不包括答案選取不適用者的分析

  扣除選取不適用者的
填問卷人數
(全部填問卷人數:121)		 非常不滿意   非常滿意
1 2 3 4 5
a. 報名程序
118 2% 5% 25% 48% 20%
b. 場地、設施、器材及其他流桯安排
121 2% 3% 15% 52% 28%
c. 會議三天的會期適當否？
115 2% 3% 18% 55% 22%
d. 活動程序的日程表
118 2% 6% 30% 48% 14%
e. 網頁
110 2% 5% 26% 45% 22%
f. 其他（請列明及表示滿意程度）：
-耳筒機的使用者
18 17% 6% 33% 33% 11%

5. 請評價會議的整體組織：

(a) 在會議中，您最欣賞及得益的是：

 
- Building up contacts with other NGO social workers for further exchange and development of services
- Through the round table forum,I can realize more about the service users' tangible and intangible needs.
- The presentation of speakers
- I just attended the parallel session, so no further comment.
- 邀請不同地區及國家的學者可以互相交流各地的文代及實踐的模式。
- 本地 / 海外同業交流
- 负责组织、接待人员的热情与周到
- 能融會多方面的專業人材
- 很多專家的經驗及知識分享
- the concept of CBT and its applciation in different work setting.
- Know more about the latest development of the field of mental health social service.
- To hear speakers sharing on concepts on Recovery Concept. To hear the voice of service users in the round table discussion.
- Key note speaker I, Plenary session , Video show -film of social work division, Caritas Hong Kong,
- Speakers share their working experiences and introduce good practice.
- 來自不同地區之服務分享，有助反思本港現況。
- The topic covered in Workshop 3.
- 明愛對有關課題的承擔及分享
- to update new knowledge and skills in clinical practice, and also the new trend of service in mental health.
- 講者準備充足. 豐富
- 對工作有新的剌激
- workshop is more useful and stimulating
- the conference allowed participates to acquire updated information and studies in mental health.
- 與會者與講員有交流的時間
- I can get most updated information from different parties
- The workshop conducted by Doctor Tse.
- share the experiences with the professionals
- The sharing with other people that lead me know the update trend of the services.
- Meet people who are in the same field.
- presentation on geriatric psychiatry
- 外地講員的臨床分享及經驗啟發
- The commitment & enthusiasm of the presenters
- 工作坊
- 認識了更多新的工作手法及服務
- Stimulation from the keynote speakers. 2. Knowing more about the service user's perspective in the round table forum.
- The speeker is very professional.The Keynote Speech is very useful.
- The speeker is very professional.
- 能參考海外機構的經驗,增加對這課題的認識
- The new concept and stimulation from the keynote speakers. Moreover, we knew more about the service user's perspective in the round table forum.
- 从社工的身上让我真正体会到了“人”的含义
- meeting with the counterparts of mental health services
- 場地很好，茶點好，但不環保
- Meeting of different professionals in the nearby countries.
- The concept of recovery
- I like the workshops part, many new ideas and experience were brought in
- A view of MH care which is very different from the UK and yet has the best elements in common.
- meeting colleagues and sharing ideas and the wonderful welcome I received from the people of Hong Kong
- 講者十分富經驗，且講學內容生動和生活化。
- New concept and skill with evidence base.
- 有服務使用者參與
- Able to gain new knowledge from teh research findings presented by the presenters.
- Workshop
- 參觀精神健康服務單位
- 欣賞本地與外國對精神健康服務的投入, 嘗試運用不同的手法及介入點為服務對象提供服務, 這些服務都是細緻和切合服務對象需要.
- mental prevention, family members mental caring
- 明愛能舉辦一個具規模及水準的大型會議
- 擴濶視野, 特別是了解外國及國內情況
- 明愛可以舉辦一個具規模及水準的國際會議的

(b) 那些地方需要改善？

 
- Arrows from KCR Station to Polytechnic needed
- 場地指示不清晰
- Headphone users should be reminded to turn off their headphones when not in use. It is very disturbing for some of them to turn it on so loud and not putting their headphone on their ears that the translation voice crashed with the presenter's voice. Perhaps an instruction to use and a warning for proper use is needed.
- 整體的研討會時間好趕急，討論的題目不能深入了解，只通常作為表面的滙報。
- 可即場做問卷調查
- 每個presentation的時間太趕，以致所得的知識廣但淺
- 講座的分享數目太多,只有15-20分鐘, 只能蜻蜓點水, 聽眾亦很吃力地吸收
- Good translation service for participants from different countries
- OK. Keep in on.
- the workshops are very popular but each workshop had only very limited seats.
- More spaces for the workshops including the physical aspect and places for registration.
- intrepretation for foreigner in parallel session
- presentation time was too short. 12 minutes was not enough. It is suggested to increase the presentation time for one presenter in a parallel session to 20 minutes.
- 需提早告知參加者名額已滿
- No formal notification has been sent to participates.Mis-leading information has been delivered that staff of Caritas were asked to give their seats to other participates other than Caritas.
- 分組研討會講員時間只有十五分鐘，講員未能詳細解說。
- To reduce the no. of presenter in each session, so they have more time to share their experience with the audience.
- To give instruction of the location of the canteens in the campus to the audience before lunch break.
- 為個90%以上是中國人，竟然用英文為主?
- Many valuable content are grouped in one time (e.g.: spirituality & family services); and therefore cannot join both.
- 題目太多，每節演講時間不夠，未能深入了解講題，很可惜
- Time is too short for each presentation. Should select the best ones & offered them longer time.
- 由於每位講者時間所限,所以講題雖夠廣,但不夠深入
- The time was not enough for speaker. Especially the keynote speakers' sharing in the round table forum.
- The logistic and Registration procedures
- 每位講者的時間太短,未能深入對講題的認識
- 分论坛找会议室很费劲，可否以后在整个的安排上能更详细更具体
- is already a very good arrangement
- 每位講者的時間太短了！
- 每位講員分享時間太短,分享太急
- The duration for conducting each pararell session and workshop is too short and rush, making the depth of the content limited. Each session should not include too many subthemes in the period.
- The parallel sessions were too short for the speakers to present their information. There should not be more than 3 speakers in a sessions.
- Instead of having two big refreshments and
- More networking and informal content. An evening venue where people can meet to discuss the day.
- more time for networking and greater structure around the timing of events
- it would be nice to provide refreshments in between lectures/workshops
- 報到安排比較混亂
- Showing of the power-point needs improvement. Prehaps due to some technical problem, the rate of the power-point showing is too fast in one presentation that I attended.
- allow more discussions
- Workshop enrolment
- 若能提供多些時間予講者, 便能更深入地了解他們的經驗及服務內容
- education to mental health patient family members
- 參加者分享時間有限，深度不足

(c) 其他意見／建議：

 
- Certain participants from mainland had been very disturbing to the audience as the kept their discusion while the presentation was going on. They showed no respect and consideration for the audience and kept on chatting and gossiping even when they are indicated that their voices was disturbing the audience very significantly. Ushers or helper should be watchful of such disturbances and be ready to stop this going on for the benefit of the audience and the speaker, and indeed the organizer.
- 紀念品不錯
- The coordination work was well organized and systematic. As presenter and also moderator of the conference, we were clearly informed about the presentation procedure and working guidelines. The preparation work was well done and very professional. The conference coordinator could provide prompt consultation and advice to the presenters
- 部份場地設施不足,需及早為有關人員提供支援
- really very impressive!
- area for further improvement: some parallel sessions' room: not enough microphone,
- Thanks for organizing this good conference.
- 分組研討會中，建議每個講題容許最少20分鐘的分享。按需要及講題以母語中文演講。
- Good conserted efforts & spirit of Caritas
- 建議講者加長時間分享
- 希望工作坊的參加名額可以增加
- 建議減少講題的數目,讓講者有更多時間分享
- a wonderful conference on the whole and a life changing experience
- This conference is a success. Congratulations
- Appreicate all the efforts done by colleagues from Caritas.
- 增加工作坊節數

6. 樂意彼此繼續聯繫的會議參加者芳名錄：

稱謂 姓名 機構 電郵
Miss A Ng HKU student 2009.hku@gmail.com
Ms Ada Poon Chinese Community Social Services Centre ada@ccssci.com.au
Ms Alice Lai Caritas-Hong Kong sehhssp2@caritassws.org.hk
Mr Blanka Kwan Caritas HUGS Centre kwanblanka@caritassws.org.hk
Mr Chan Chi Tak Caritas  
Mr Chan Chi Wah Caritas Addicted Gamblers Counselling Centre alfredccw424@yahoo.com.hk
Miss Chan Pui Sze Caritas AGCC egb@ether-net.com
Mr Chan Wai Kit Caritas Hong Kong sparkmarco@hotmail.com
Miss Chan Yin Stewards Limited yinhar.chan@stewards.org.hk
Dr Estella Chan City University of Hong Kong estella@cityu.edu.hk
Miss Esther lam Caritas lamesther@caritassws.org.hk
Mr Fred Lai Caritas YCS laifred40@gmail.com
Mr Fung Chu Caritas Play Safe Projects chufung@caritassws.org.hk
Ms Heidi Hui HKU  
Ms Ida Ma Caritas Hong Kong idama97@yahoo.com.hk
Mr Jeff Shaw Shetland Islands Council and NHS Shetland jeffshaw@shetland.gov.uk
Ms Joyce Cheung Siu Chong   cheung_siu_chong@yahoo.com.hk
Mr Kwan Hoi Tin Caritas Lok Mo IVTC kwanbt@caritassws.org.hk
Mr Lai Tsz Chung, Water Caritas Lok Heep Club watermbti@yahoo.com.hk
Miss Lee Yiu Kwan Hong Kong Christian Service pec@hkcs.org
Ms Leung Kam Ping Julitta Caritas Hong Kong leungjulitta@gmail.com
Ms Lo Kit Bing Candy Yan Oi Chest Clinic  
Dr Lou Vivian HKU wlou@hku.hk
Ms MA SO LING, ANDREA Department of Health no_cl@dh.gov.hk
Mr Michael Caritas  
Ms Mok Yim Ping New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association ide@nlpra.org.hk
Ms Ng Yin Ling, Tabitha HK Shue Yan University ylng@hksyu.edu
Ms Pinky Yung Caritas-Hong Kong pp3604@yahoo.com
Ms Sok Dearozet Caritas-CCAMH, Cambodia dearozet@gmail.com
Dr William Chui Castle Peak Hospital cwh687@ha.org.hk
Mr William Tong Amazing Transformation wtong@transformation.com.hk
Ms WONG Puihing The Salvation army as-tpissc@ssd.salvation.org.hk
Mr Wong Yiu Fai FCSC wilsonwong@cfcsc.org.hk
Ms WOO WAI YAN YAN OIT ONG wy.woo@yot.org.hk
Ms 周美詩 明愛樂行工場 choumeisze@caritassws.org.hk
Ms 唐曉姣   qingyeye@yahoo.com.cn
Miss 孫嘉琪 香港明愛 suenkaki@caritassws.org.hk
Ms 陳淑蘭 明愛家長資源中心 chansuklan@caritassws.org.hk
Ms 陳淑蘭 明愛家長資源  
Dr 楊發輝 重慶市精神病院社會工作科 fahui2005@yahoo.com.cn
Prof 楊鋥 上海大學社會學系 yangzeng@ shu.edu.cn
Miss 陳香君 中山大學政治與公共事務管理學院 chxj0215@yahoo.com.cn
 
 
  © 「社區精神健康－實踐與展望」會議, 版權所有　不得轉載 | 使用條款