推广社区精神健康——议题、成就及未来展望 主办机构——香港明爱
会议资料
会议主题及副题
会议程序表
主题演讲及公开论坛讲者
提交论文撮要
参加者天地
住宿资料
繁体中文 English 返回主页
   
進入
联络我们
 
参加者天地

检讨表数据分析 (121人填写问卷)

1. 您如何评价会议各项程序的内容／安排？

(甲) 包括答案选取不适用者的分析

  非常不满意    非常满意 不适用
1 2 3 4 5
a. 大会主题 I 2% 2% 5% 48% 14% 29%
b. 大会主题 II 2% 2% 8% 47% 14% 27%
c. 公开论坛 1 2% 3% 6% 44% 8% 37%
d. 公开论坛 2 2% 3% 6% 44% 8% 37%
e. 公开论坛 3 2% 3% 6% 36% 11% 42%
f. 工作坊 3% 3% 11% 29% 15% 39%
g. 分组研讨会 2% 6% 15% 49% 13% 15%
h. 参观精神健康服务单位 1% 1% 2% 16% 7% 73%
i. 圆桌会议 2% 4% 3% 26% 12% 53%
j. 会议场刊 2% 3% 10% 48% 24% 13%
k. 整体安排 2% 6% 11% 59% 19% 3%

(乙) 不包括答案选取不适用者的分析

  扣除选取不适用者的
填问卷人数
(全部填问卷人数:121)		 非常不满意   非常满意
1 2 3 4 5
a. 大会主题 I 86 2% 2% 8% 68% 20%
b. 大会主题 II 88 2% 3% 11% 64% 20%
c. 公开论坛 1 76 3% 5% 9% 70% 13%
d. 公开论坛 2 81 2% 5% 19% 58% 16%
e. 公开论坛 3 70 3% 4% 10% 63% 20%
f. 工作坊 73 4% 4% 19% 48% 25%
g. 分组研讨会 103 2% 8% 17% 57% 16%
h. 参观精神健康服务单位 32 3% 3% 6% 63% 25%
i. 圆桌会议 57 4% 9% 7% 54% 26%
j. 会议场刊 105 2% 4% 11% 55% 28%
k. 整体安排 117 2% 6% 12% 61% 19%

2. 您如何评价会议主题及内容的益处？

  非常不满意   非常满意
1 2 3 4 5
a. 对您现在及未来工作的益处
1% 7% 21% 62% 9%
b. 内容与您从事临床实务工作的相关性
1% 5% 30% 52% 12%
c. 内容范围的涵盖性
1% 7% 25% 57% 10%
d. 内容的深度与广度
2% 12% 46% 35% 5%
e. 提供最新的知识
1% 2% 32% 54% 11%
f. 增强您的承担
1% 3% 38% 50% 8%
g. 达到您的期望
1% 8% 34% 49% 8%

3. 若以下所列各项为您的目的，您如何评价这些目的在会议中的达致程度？

  非常不满意   非常满意
1 2 3 4 5
a. 获得新知识及概念以提升个人 / 专业发展
2% 6% 28% 55% 9%
b. 获得新知识及技巧以改善服务
2% 4% 33% 54% 7%
c. 透过与本地 / 海外同业交流经验，扩濶个人视野
2% 5% 25% 56% 12%
d. 为未来的资讯交流，与参加者 / 机构建立联系
2% 17% 39% 34% 8%
e. 其他（请列明及表示达致程度）：
- 给讲者的发言时间
- 扩阔社会工作及临床研究的知识
1% 6% 6% 6% 12%

4. 其他

(甲) 包括答案选取不适用者的分析

  非常不满意   非常满意 不适用
1 2 3 4 5
a. 报名程序
2% 5% 25% 46% 20% 2%
b. 场地丶设施丶器材及其他流桯安排
2% 3% 15% 52% 28% 0
c. 会议三天的会期适当否？
2% 3% 17% 52% 21% 5%
d. 活动程序的日程表
2% 6% 30% 47% 13% 2%
e. 网页
2% 4% 24% 41% 20% 9%
f. 其他（请列明及表示满意程度）：
- 耳筒机的使用者
3% 1% 5% 5% 2% 19%

(乙) 不包括答案选取不适用者的分析

  扣除选取不适用者的
填问卷人数
(全部填问卷人数:121)		 非常不满意   非常满意
1 2 3 4 5
a. 报名程序
118 2% 5% 25% 48% 20%
b. 场地丶设施丶器材及其他流桯安排
121 2% 3% 15% 52% 28%
c. 会议三天的会期适当否？
115 2% 3% 18% 55% 22%
d. 活动程序的日程表
118 2% 6% 30% 48% 14%
e. 网页
110 2% 5% 26% 45% 22%
f. 其他（请列明及表示满意程度）：
-耳筒机的使用者
18 17% 6% 33% 33% 11%

5. 请评价会议的整体组织：

(a) 在会议中，您最欣赏及得益的是：

 
- Building up contacts with other NGO social workers for further exchange and development of services
- Through the round table forum,I can realize more about the service users' tangible and intangible needs.
- The presentation of speakers
- I just attended the parallel session, so no further comment.
- 邀请不同地区及国家的学者可以互相交流各地的文代及实践的模式。
- 本地 / 海外同业交流
- 负责组织丶接待人员的热情与周到
- 能融会多方面的专业人材
- 很多专家的经验及知识分享
- the concept of CBT and its applciation in different work setting.
- Know more about the latest development of the field of mental health social service.
- To hear speakers sharing on concepts on Recovery Concept. To hear the voice of service users in the round table discussion.
- Key note speaker I, Plenary session , Video show -film of social work division, Caritas Hong Kong,
- Speakers share their working experiences and introduce good practice.
- 来自不同地区之服务分享，有助反思本港现况。
- The topic covered in Workshop 3.
- 明爱对有关课题的承担及分享
- to update new knowledge and skills in clinical practice, and also the new trend of service in mental health.
- 讲者准备充足. 丰富
- 对工作有新的剌激
- workshop is more useful and stimulating
- the conference allowed participates to acquire updated information and studies in mental health.
- 与会者与讲员有交流的时间
- I can get most updated information from different parties
- The workshop conducted by Doctor Tse.
- share the experiences with the professionals
- The sharing with other people that lead me know the update trend of the services.
- Meet people who are in the same field.
- presentation on geriatric psychiatry
- 外地讲员的临床分享及经验启发
- The commitment & enthusiasm of the presenters
- 工作坊
- 认识了更多新的工作手法及服务
- Stimulation from the keynote speakers. 2. Knowing more about the service user's perspective in the round table forum.
- The speeker is very professional.The Keynote Speech is very useful.
- The speeker is very professional.
- 能参考海外机构的经验,增加对这课题的认识
- The new concept and stimulation from the keynote speakers. Moreover, we knew more about the service user's perspective in the round table forum.
- 从社工的身上让我真正体会到了“人”的含义
- meeting with the counterparts of mental health services
- 场地很好，茶点好，但不环保
- Meeting of different professionals in the nearby countries.
- The concept of recovery
- I like the workshops part, many new ideas and experience were brought in
- A view of MH care which is very different from the UK and yet has the best elements in common.
- meeting colleagues and sharing ideas and the wonderful welcome I received from the people of Hong Kong
- 讲者十分富经验，且讲学内容生动和生活化。
- New concept and skill with evidence base.
- 有服务使用者参与
- Able to gain new knowledge from teh research findings presented by the presenters.
- Workshop
- 参观精神健康服务单位
- 欣赏本地与外国对精神健康服务的投入, 尝试运用不同的手法及介入点为服务对象提供服务, 这些服务都是细致和切合服务对象需要.
- mental prevention, family members mental caring
- 明爱能举办一个具规模及水准的大型会议
- 扩濶视野, 特别是了解外国及国内情况
- 明爱可以举办一个具规模及水准的国际会议的

(b) 那些地方需要改善？

 
- Arrows from KCR Station to Polytechnic needed
- 场地指示不清晰
- Headphone users should be reminded to turn off their headphones when not in use. It is very disturbing for some of them to turn it on so loud and not putting their headphone on their ears that the translation voice crashed with the presenter's voice. Perhaps an instruction to use and a warning for proper use is needed.
- 整体的研讨会时间好赶急，讨论的题目不能深入了解，只通常作为表面的滙报。
- 可即场做问卷调查
- 每个presentation的时间太赶，以致所得的知识广但浅
- 讲座的分享数目太多,只有15-20分钟, 只能蜻蜓点水, 听众亦很吃力地吸收
- Good translation service for participants from different countries
- OK. Keep in on.
- the workshops are very popular but each workshop had only very limited seats.
- More spaces for the workshops including the physical aspect and places for registration.
- intrepretation for foreigner in parallel session
- presentation time was too short. 12 minutes was not enough. It is suggested to increase the presentation time for one presenter in a parallel session to 20 minutes.
- 需提早告知参加者名额已满
- No formal notification has been sent to participates.Mis-leading information has been delivered that staff of Caritas were asked to give their seats to other participates other than Caritas.
- 分组研讨会讲员时间只有十五分钟，讲员未能详细解说。
- To reduce the no. of presenter in each session, so they have more time to share their experience with the audience.
- To give instruction of the location of the canteens in the campus to the audience before lunch break.
- 为个90%以上是中国人，竟然用英文为主?
- Many valuable content are grouped in one time (e.g.: spirituality & family services); and therefore cannot join both.
- 题目太多，每节演讲时间不够，未能深入了解讲题，很可惜
- Time is too short for each presentation. Should select the best ones & offered them longer time.
- 由於每位讲者时间所限,所以讲题虽够广,但不够深入
- The time was not enough for speaker. Especially the keynote speakers' sharing in the round table forum.
- The logistic and Registration procedures
- 每位讲者的时间太短,未能深入对讲题的认识
- 分论坛找会议室很费劲，可否以后在整个的安排上能更详细更具体
- is already a very good arrangement
- 每位讲者的时间太短了！
- 每位讲员分享时间太短,分享太急
- The duration for conducting each pararell session and workshop is too short and rush, making the depth of the content limited. Each session should not include too many subthemes in the period.
- The parallel sessions were too short for the speakers to present their information. There should not be more than 3 speakers in a sessions.
- Instead of having two big refreshments and
- More networking and informal content. An evening venue where people can meet to discuss the day.
- more time for networking and greater structure around the timing of events
- it would be nice to provide refreshments in between lectures/workshops
- 报到安排比较混乱
- Showing of the power-point needs improvement. Prehaps due to some technical problem, the rate of the power-point showing is too fast in one presentation that I attended.
- allow more discussions
- Workshop enrolment
- 若能提供多些时间予讲者, 便能更深入地了解他们的经验及服务内容
- education to mental health patient family members
- 参加者分享时间有限，深度不足

(c) 其他意见／建议：

 
- Certain participants from mainland had been very disturbing to the audience as the kept their discusion while the presentation was going on. They showed no respect and consideration for the audience and kept on chatting and gossiping even when they are indicated that their voices was disturbing the audience very significantly. Ushers or helper should be watchful of such disturbances and be ready to stop this going on for the benefit of the audience and the speaker, and indeed the organizer.
- 纪念品不错
- The coordination work was well organized and systematic. As presenter and also moderator of the conference, we were clearly informed about the presentation procedure and working guidelines. The preparation work was well done and very professional. The conference coordinator could provide prompt consultation and advice to the presenters
- 部份场地设施不足,需及早为有关人员提供支援
- really very impressive!
- area for further improvement: some parallel sessions' room: not enough microphone,
- Thanks for organizing this good conference.
- 分组研讨会中，建议每个讲题容许最少20分钟的分享。按需要及讲题以母语中文演讲。
- Good conserted efforts & spirit of Caritas
- 建议讲者加长时间分享
- 希望工作坊的参加名额可以增加
- 建议减少讲题的数目,让讲者有更多时间分享
- a wonderful conference on the whole and a life changing experience
- This conference is a success. Congratulations
- Appreicate all the efforts done by colleagues from Caritas.
- 增加工作坊节数

6. 乐意彼此继续联系的会议参加者芳名录：

称谓 姓名 机构 电邮
Miss A Ng HKU student 2009.hku@gmail.com
Ms Ada Poon Chinese Community Social Services Centre ada@ccssci.com.au
Ms Alice Lai Caritas-Hong Kong sehhssp2@caritassws.org.hk
Mr Blanka Kwan Caritas HUGS Centre kwanblanka@caritassws.org.hk
Mr Chan Chi Tak Caritas  
Mr Chan Chi Wah Caritas Addicted Gamblers Counselling Centre alfredccw424@yahoo.com.hk
Miss Chan Pui Sze Caritas AGCC egb@ether-net.com
Mr Chan Wai Kit Caritas Hong Kong sparkmarco@hotmail.com
Miss Chan Yin Stewards Limited yinhar.chan@stewards.org.hk
Dr Estella Chan City University of Hong Kong estella@cityu.edu.hk
Miss Esther lam Caritas lamesther@caritassws.org.hk
Mr Fred Lai Caritas YCS laifred40@gmail.com
Mr Fung Chu Caritas Play Safe Projects chufung@caritassws.org.hk
Ms Heidi Hui HKU  
Ms Ida Ma Caritas Hong Kong idama97@yahoo.com.hk
Mr Jeff Shaw Shetland Islands Council and NHS Shetland jeffshaw@shetland.gov.uk
Ms Joyce Cheung Siu Chong   cheung_siu_chong@yahoo.com.hk
Mr Kwan Hoi Tin Caritas Lok Mo IVTC kwanbt@caritassws.org.hk
Mr Lai Tsz Chung, Water Caritas Lok Heep Club watermbti@yahoo.com.hk
Miss Lee Yiu Kwan Hong Kong Christian Service pec@hkcs.org
Ms Leung Kam Ping Julitta Caritas Hong Kong leungjulitta@gmail.com
Ms Lo Kit Bing Candy Yan Oi Chest Clinic  
Dr Lou Vivian HKU wlou@hku.hk
Ms MA SO LING, ANDREA Department of Health no_cl@dh.gov.hk
Mr Michael Caritas  
Ms Mok Yim Ping New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association ide@nlpra.org.hk
Ms Ng Yin Ling, Tabitha HK Shue Yan University ylng@hksyu.edu
Ms Pinky Yung Caritas-Hong Kong pp3604@yahoo.com
Ms Sok Dearozet Caritas-CCAMH, Cambodia dearozet@gmail.com
Dr William Chui Castle Peak Hospital cwh687@ha.org.hk
Mr William Tong Amazing Transformation wtong@transformation.com.hk
Ms WONG Puihing The Salvation army as-tpissc@ssd.salvation.org.hk
Mr Wong Yiu Fai FCSC wilsonwong@cfcsc.org.hk
Ms WOO WAI YAN YAN OIT ONG wy.woo@yot.org.hk
Ms 周美诗 明爱乐行工场 choumeisze@caritassws.org.hk
Ms 唐晓姣   qingyeye@yahoo.com.cn
Miss 孙嘉琪 香港明爱 suenkaki@caritassws.org.hk
Ms 陈淑兰 明爱家长资源中心 chansuklan@caritassws.org.hk
Ms 陈淑兰 明爱家长资源  
Dr 杨发辉 重庆市精神病院社会工作科 fahui2005@yahoo.com.cn
Prof 杨鋥 上海大学社会学系 yangzeng@ shu.edu.cn
Miss 陈香君 中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院 chxj0215@yahoo.com.cn
 
 
  © 「社区精神健康－实践与展望」会议, 版权所有　不得转载 | 使用条款